The government is taking over Banks, the Auto Industry, and Healthcare. Is your business next?

August 22nd, 2009 bradley Posted in Uncategorized, philosophy, politics No Comments »

(I started this post about six months ago. Still relevant today. So much has happened since the Bank “bailout” that shows what a foolish move it was.)

Wall Street Journal, October 15, 2008, p. A1, A4,
At Moment of Truth, U.S. Forced Big Bankers To Blink

“As the meeting neared a close, each banker was handed a term sheet detailing how the government would take stakes valued at a combined $125 billion in their banks, and impose new restrictions over executive pay and dividend policies.
“The participants, among the nation’s best deal makers, were in a peculiar position. They weren’t allowed to negotiate. Mr. Paulson requested that each of them sign. It was for their own good and the good of the country, he said, according to a person in the room.”

” Policy makers knew they were taking unprecedented steps. It would take years to disentangle banks from the federal government.”

If you think it doesn’t matter what they do to those wealthy, over-paid bankers then please consider this from John Adams:

[Adams] stopped one night at a tavern in Shrewsbury, about forty miles from Boston. ” . . . as I was cold and wet I sat down at a good fire in the bar-room to dry my great coat and saddle-bags till a fire could be made in my chamber. There presently came in, one after another, half a dozen, or half a score, substantial yeomen of the neighborhood, who, sitting down to the fire after lighting their pipes, began a lively conversation upon politics. As I believed I was unknown to all of them, I sat in total silence to hear them. One said, “The people of Boston are distracted.” Another answered, “No wonder the people of Boston are distracted; oppression will make wise men mad.” A third said,·”What would you say, if a fellow should come to your house and tell you he was come to take a list of your cattle that parliament might tax you for them at so much a head? And how should you feel, if he was to go and break open your barn, to take down your oxen, cows, horses, and sheep?·” “What should I say?” replied the first; “I would knock him on the head.” “Well,” said a fourth, “if parliament can take away Mr. Hancock’s wharf and Mr. Rowe’s wharf, they can take away your barn and my house.” After much more reasoning in this style, a fifth, who had as yet been silent, broke out, “Well, it is high time for us to rebel. We must rebel some time or other: and we had better rebel now than any time to come: if we put it off for ten or twenty years, and let them go on as they have begun, they will get a strong party among us, and plague us a great deal more than they can now. As yet, they have but a small party on their side.” (John Adams, David McCullough, p. 74)

If you think your business is safe from government take over, think again. Ever wondered what it would be like working for the INS or the IRS? You may soon find out.

It is time for a peaceful, non-violent rebellion. Let’s hope that a violent one is never necessary.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

4th of July Parade – Freedom Award Recipients

July 9th, 2008 bradley Posted in Uncategorized 2 Comments »

Our family traditionally attends the Provo 4th of July parade. I was sitting in the crowd when the Freedom Award Recipients began passing. I couldn’t remember a lot of details but I did know that Major Brian Shul had been terribly burned when his plane crashed and he had returned to active duty as soon as his wounds permitted. I stood and clapped. I looked around. Amazing! I was the only one. I felt embarrassed to be standing there by myself.

Read the rest of this entry »

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Chris Cannon’s blog isn’t really a blog

June 20th, 2008 bradley Posted in Uncategorized 1 Comment »

Here is the post I submitted to Chris Cannon’s “blog” in which he claims Jason is contradicting himself.

Jason’s past as a Democrat puts him in great company — none other than Ronald Reagan. There must be something about being a convert from socialism that makes for a stronger conservative.

Most of these “contradictions” only appear contradictory because of the way they are presented. For example the one on earmarks–Jason maintains that earmarks are the wrong way for congress to do business. If YOU don’t think Jason can get the money without using earmarks that doesn’t mean he’s contradicting himself. It just means he’s choosing to do things in a more principled way even if it is a more difficult way.

Also, I think the Governor is a big boy and can handle a disagreement over an issue such as “global warming.” I noticed (on the campaign finance website OpenSecrets) that Huntsman Corp donated to the Chaffetz campaign and I didn’t see a similar donation to Cannon. Even if the Governor wasn’t pleased with Jason’s comment his family business is still donating to Chaffetz, not Cannon.

I submitted this to Representative Cannon’s blog over 27 hours ago. I’m sure he’s busy but he had time to approve a pro-Cannon post that was submitted 4 hours after mine.

I didn’t take much time answering all of Cannon’s warping of Jason’s positions because I doubted that he’d actually approve my post.  But someone that did take the time to answer each of Rep. Cannon’s pathetic arguments and put it on their own blog — http://rustedroots.blogspot.com/
Vote for Jason Chaffetz!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button